There is a hard conflict that they cannot go against powers if they are willing to challenge the U.S. and the rules-based international orders, that it strives to protect. These dual states are not doing anything but only putting them into the downfall.
Apart from all the things and challenges, it is ironic that the United States and Israel that were founded in the aftermath of World War 2 have spent a better part of their time in recent 75 years where they faced challenging rule-based international orders that they advocate.
The RBO was not established for no reason; it was organized in World War 2, under U.S. leadership to prevent the conflict from getting worse. During that time, it killed 50 million million people including 6 million Jews in the Nazi holocaust.
The chain of RBO is mainly connected to the U.N; it is the pillar of the RBO. It is maintained by keeping international peace, preventing wars of aggression and ensuring that human rights are not affected in the world such as those that were committed in the holocaust and are not repeated.
U.S. and Israel have always been cautious about every matter; they regarded the U.N with critical skepticism and have taken measures that have at times limited its effectiveness.
there was a book in 2008 content named,’’ the Costs of War’ In matters of international law, the UN, and global order, there has been a persistent breach of the “Nuremberg Promise” the principle that the legal standards used against the Nazi regime would apply to all future states, including the U.S. and other Allied Powers from WWII. This disregard, according to Falk, has “repeatedly and defiantly” compromised the possibility of achieving lasting peace and stability worldwide. He asserts that the U.S., in particular, has actively worked to “weaken international law” and “undermine the authority of the United Nations.
The United States’ foreign policy decisions are systematically demonstrated for famous philosopher Noam Chomsky who wrote about Washington’s contempt for the international system.
us always take steps with planning and proper view, they have a history of invoking the importance of RBO or to protect the U.N, the there is a connection in it, that the U.S does this only to maintain themselves or for their interests such as when they have to stigmatize the enemies.
U.S. seems to be in more power because if the U.N. refuses to follow the orders by the U.S. lead or makes a move that neglects the U.S. policy or orders, or if it is against the interests of the U.S. then Washington immediately contempt for the organization.
The U.S. “contempt” for the international system is most clearly illustrated by its veto record at the UN Security Council. From 1972, when the U.S. first exercised its veto power to support Israel, until December 2023, the U.S. vetoed 77 resolutions, 45 of which were critical of Israel.
Leave feedback about this