The Professor Amy Wax was accused of making racist statements when he invited a white nationalist to her class and stated that black people and women are less intellectual. This caused students to file for her removal, so they had to fire her.
The issue arose when a tenured professor at the University of Pennsylvania was fired due to racist, sexist and homophobic remarks. Also, mention black people.
When Dr. Wax was suspended ‘the university issued a suspension letter ‘public letter of reprimand’ that explained the terms of suspension. This also includes the information about pay that she had lost. This will begin in the fall of 2025.
The disciplinary proceedings against Dr. Wax were improvised if the tenure protections and whether such protections allow them to raise opinions that might be as inappropriate or downright insulting. Several students agreed that they were not willing to trust Dr. Wax for her remarks. However, some of the professors tried to discipline her even after her racist remarks.
She faced accusations of calling certain non-Western countries “shitholes” and claiming that women, on average, are less knowledgeable than men are. Additionally, she argued that Black Americans and individuals from non-Western nations experience shame due to the “outsized achievements and contributions” of Western societies. She also criticized television advertisements portraying “Black men married to white women in upper-class, picket-fence homes, deeming such depictions unrealistic.
Unfortunately, Dr. Wax denied these remarks; she said ‘I have not said it all; some of the things are taken out of context’
She invited a white nationalist, Jared Taylor to the class.
The law school dean, Theodore Ruger at the time wrote that Dr. Wax had demonstrated ‘callous and flagrant disregard’ for students, faculty and staff, leading them to ‘intentional and incessant racist, sexist, xenophobic and homophobic actions and statements. This was mentioned in a 12-page complaint file in 2023.
The complaint added was that the students and faculty believe that they will be discriminated against anonymously if they come in contact with her.’ Mr. Ruger declined to comment on Monday.
Dr. Wax does not agree with it and she have declined to comment on the decision saying that she has already warned the university that she will sue them if they try to discipline her. David j. Shapiro, who is the lawyer to Dr. Wax, also declined to comment.
This case was a threat for one of the key tenets of the tenure, which includes the right of faculty members to speak freely, without fear of judgment or punishment, whether in public or in the classroom.
When Alex Morey reviewed the suspension, an official with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a free speech group, said that Penn’s decision should send a chill down the spine of every faculty member, not just here, but in every institution.
In an argument by Ms. Morey, the group’s director of campus rights advocacy, that Penn altered its customary discipline procedure to prosecute Dr. Wax, she mentioned that she is amazed that Penn did not revoke Dr. Wax’s tenure. This is an indication of how flimsy were the accusations.
According to Peter Wood, the president of the conservative-leaning National Association of Scholars’ Professor Wax’s various statements on race, ethnicity, gender, immigration, enculturation and other matters were whole for academic freedom and within its zone. after predicting that Dr. Wax would not back down.
Dr. Wax, a former assistant to the U.S. solicitor general who argued 15 cases before the Supreme Court, has long been a controversial figure due to her outspoken views. Calls for sanctions intensified in 2017 after she co-authored an article asserting, “All cultures are not equal.” The university’s disciplinary process, which included a faculty hearing committee, ultimately determined that while her speech was protected by academic freedom, she violated “behavioral professional norms” in the way she expressed her opinions.
In a letter dated September 24, signed by the university’s provost, John L. Jackson Jr., it was noted that although academic freedom should be “very broad,” professors must maintain a commitment to treating all students fairly. The letter criticized Dr. Wax for making “sweeping generalizations about groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and immigration status. Additionally, it highlighted that she had breached confidentiality by publicly discussing the grades of law students by race, despite being warned by the dean that such actions violated university policy.
The letter further stated that the university’s interim president, J. Larry Jameson, had upheld the decision to suspend Dr. Wax, though the suspension will not take effect until the next academic year, as first reported by The Philadelphia Inquirer. Moving forward, Dr. Wax is also required to clarify during public appearances that she is speaking on her behalf and not as a representative of the university.
Leave feedback about this